Within Scientific explanations
What The Condon Report Concluded
The Condon Report evaluated UFO cases and concluded that existing evidence had not revealed scientifically important unknown technology.
On this page
- The study's investigation approach
- Findings from examined cases
- Debates over its conclusions
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Condon Report, formally titled Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, was the largest government-sponsored scientific investigation of UFO reports conducted in the United States during the twentieth century. Led by physicist Edward U. Condon at the University of Colorado between 1966 and 1968, the study examined existing UFO records to determine whether they revealed evidence of unknown technology or a subject worthy of further scientific investigation. Its central conclusion was that the accumulated evidence had not produced discoveries of scientific importance and that further large-scale UFO research was unlikely to advance science.[Condon Report]condon.ncas.orgCondon ReportCondon Report -NCAS Introduction…
The report became a defining reference point in debates about UFOs and science. Supporters viewed it as a rigorous assessment showing that unusual sightings were not evidence of extraterrestrial craft. Critics argued that the report’s overall conclusion did not fully reflect the unresolved cases contained within its own investigations and questioned aspects of the project’s management.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP CodexUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP Codex
The study’s investigation approach
The Condon Report emerged from a period when UFO reports had become a public and political issue in the United States. The U.S. Air Force had already investigated thousands of sightings through Project Blue Book, but pressure grew for an independent scientific review. The University of Colorado project was funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and was intended to evaluate whether UFO reports contained evidence that could contribute to scientific knowledge.[NCAS PDF Directory]files.ncas.orgPDF Directory Condon Report, University of Colorado Submission LetterNCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, University of Colorado Submission LetterOctober 31, 1968…
Rather than attempting to prove or disprove extraterrestrial visitation directly, the study focused on whether UFO reports contained reliable physical evidence of unknown phenomena. Researchers examined witness accounts, photographs, radar information, astronomical possibilities, atmospheric effects, psychological factors and technological explanations. The final report was extensive, containing hundreds of case discussions and technical analyses.[NCAS PDF Directory]files.ncas.orgPDF Directory Condon Report, University of Colorado NoticeNCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, University of Colorado Notice…
The project’s investigators treated UFO reports as scientific data problems: observations had to be assessed against possible conventional explanations before extraordinary interpretations could be considered. This approach reflected a broader scientific principle used in many fields: an unexplained observation is not automatically evidence for a new physical phenomenon. A case may remain unresolved because of missing information, poor measurements or incomplete records rather than because it demonstrates unknown technology.
Findings from examined cases
The main finding of the Condon Report was that UFO investigations had not produced evidence of technology beyond known human capabilities. Condon’s summary stated that the study had found nothing from two decades of UFO reports that added to scientific knowledge and concluded that further extensive investigation was unlikely to be scientifically productive.[NCAS PDF Directory]files.ncas.orgPDF Directory Condon Report, Section I: Conclusions & RecommendationsNCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, Section I: Conclusions & Recommendations…
Many individual cases examined by the project were attributed to ordinary causes. Researchers identified explanations involving aircraft, astronomical objects, balloons, atmospheric phenomena, misinterpretations of lights and errors in observation. These findings supported the view that many UFO reports arise from genuine observations that are later incorrectly identified.
However, the report did not classify every investigated case as solved. Some cases remained unexplained because available evidence was insufficient to determine what had been observed. This distinction became central to later debates: an unresolved case was not considered proof of an unknown craft, but it also was not the same as a confirmed conventional explanation. Critics of the report argued that the presence of unresolved cases weakened the simplicity of the final negative conclusion.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP CodexUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP Codex
The report’s scientific importance therefore rested less on identifying a new phenomenon and more on establishing an evidential threshold. It argued that UFO reports, as then documented, lacked the kind of repeatable measurements, physical samples or controlled observations required for a major scientific discovery.
Debates over its conclusions
The Condon Report received strong institutional support after publication, including endorsement from a review panel of the National Academy of Sciences, which concluded that the study provided a useful evaluation of the available evidence. The report subsequently influenced the end of official Air Force UFO investigations, with Project Blue Book closing in 1969.[Condon Report]condon.ncas.orgCondon ReportCondon Report -NCAS Introduction…
Nevertheless, the report remained controversial among some scientists and UFO researchers. One major criticism concerned internal disagreements within the project. Critics highlighted a 1966 memorandum by project coordinator Robert Low, later known as the “Low memo”, which appeared to suggest that some project organisers expected a negative conclusion before the investigation was complete. Supporters of the report argued that the final scientific work should be judged by the published evidence rather than by internal disputes over planning and expectations.[New Space Economy]newspaceeconomy.caNew Space EconomyThe Condon Report: A Scientific Study of UFOs | New Space EconomyNovember 26, 2025…
Another criticism focused on the difference between Condon’s summary conclusions and some case analyses in the body of the report. Critics argued that certain unresolved cases deserved more attention, while defenders responded that unexplained observations do not automatically indicate revolutionary technology and that the overall evidence still failed to support extraordinary claims.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP CodexUAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP Codex
Why the Condon Report still shapes UFO science debates
The lasting importance of the Condon Report comes from its role as a boundary-setting document. It did not establish that every UFO report had been explained, but it argued that the available evidence had not demonstrated a scientifically significant unknown phenomenon. This distinction continues to influence later discussions about unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), where researchers often separate “unidentified” from “evidence of new technology”.[NCAS PDF Directory]files.ncas.orgPDF Directory Condon Report, Section I: Conclusions & RecommendationsNCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, Section I: Conclusions & Recommendations…
Within the wider relationship between UFOs and science fiction, the report marked a contrast between imaginative possibilities and scientific standards of evidence. Science fiction often explores advanced spacecraft and extraterrestrial contact as possibilities, while the Condon investigation asked a narrower empirical question: whether real-world observations provided measurable evidence for such claims. Its conclusion was that they did not.[NCAS PDF Directory]files.ncas.orgPDF Directory Condon Report, Section I: Conclusions & RecommendationsNCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, Section I: Conclusions & Recommendations…
The report remains influential because it illustrates a recurring challenge in evaluating extraordinary claims: scientific investigation must account for both the possibility that observations reveal something unusual and the possibility that ordinary explanations are sufficient. The Condon Report’s central legacy is therefore not simply a verdict on UFOs, but a long-running debate over how science should assess uncertain evidence.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What The Condon Report Concluded. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
Why People Believe Weird Things
Rating: 4.5/5 from 5 Google Books ratings
"This sparkling book romps over the range of science and anti-science." --Jared Diamond, author of Guns, Germs, and Steel Revised and Exp...
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, written by Captain Edward Ruppelt in 1956, was the first serious, unbiased account written abo...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO researcher mug oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: condon.ncas.org
Link:https://condon.ncas.org/text/intro.htm
Source snippet
Condon ReportCondon Report -NCAS Introduction...
2.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: PDF Directory Condon Report, Section I: Conclusions & Recommendations
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/sec-i.htm
Source snippet
NCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, Section I: Conclusions & Recommendations...
3.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: PDF Directory Condon Report, University of Colorado Submission Letter
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/covrletr.htm
Source snippet
NCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, University of Colorado Submission LetterOctober 31, 1968...
Published: October 31, 1968
4.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: PDF Directory Condon Report, University of Colorado Notice
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/ucnotice.htm
Source snippet
NCAS PDF DirectoryCondon Report, University of Colorado Notice...
5.
Source: colorado.edu
Link:https://www.colorado.edu/coloradan/2021/11/05/condon-report-cu-boulders-historic-ufo-study
6.
Source: colorado.edu
Link:https://www.colorado.edu/today/2021/06/09/cu-site-one-last-government-commissioned-reports-ufos-what-does-it-say
7.
Source: ncas.org
Link:https://www.ncas.org/p/library.html
8.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: sec ii
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/sec-ii.htm
9.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/contents.htm
10.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/s6chap02.htm
11.
Source: condon.ncas.org
Link:https://condon.ncas.org/text/s5chap03.htm
12.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/s3chap02.htm
13.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/s6chap01.htm
14.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/s5chap02.htm
15.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/preface.htm
16.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon
17.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: appndx u
Link:https://files.ncas.org/condon/text/appndx-u.htm
18.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Condon Report
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W7SqS6UhE4
Source snippet
Results of the largest UFO analyses and studies...
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Results of the largest UFO analyses and studies
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlfX_4KVX_4
Source snippet
Project Blue Book...
20.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjinS2lZAsY
Source snippet
America's Obsession with UFOs...
21.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: UAP Codex Condon Report · USAF–University of Colorado study · UAP Codex
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/condon-report-1968/
22.
Source: newspaceeconomy.ca
Link:https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/11/26/the-condon-report-a-scientific-study-of-ufos/
Source snippet
New Space EconomyThe Condon Report: A Scientific Study of UFOs | New Space EconomyNovember 26, 2025...
Published: November 26, 2025
23.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Condon Report | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Condon_Report
Source snippet
Condon Report | WikiDiscJune 12, 2026 — SCIENTIFIC CRITICISM AND ANALYSIS[EDIT | EDIT SOURCE] The Condon Report faced substantial scienti...
Published: June 12, 2026
24.
Source: decur.org
Title: condon report 1969
Link:https://decur.org/documents/condon-report-1969
Additional References
25.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3qWyN8rxzw
Source snippet
The Condon Report This video directly highlights the U.S. Air Force commissioning of the 1968 Condon Report to evaluate UFO sightings and...
26.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Title: decade 1960s condon report 1968 ad0680975
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-1960s-condon-report-1968-ad0680975
Source snippet
UFO TransparencyThe Condon Report (DTIC AD0680975), University of Colorado / U.S. Air Force (sponsor) · 1969 · UFO Transparency...
27.
Source: enigmalabs.io
Title: Condon Committee | Enigma Labs
Link:https://enigmalabs.io/library/a255a907-d10f-49f2-89e0-13e57b0e006a
Source snippet
May 2, 2023 — THE REPORT SELECTING INCIDENTS FOR INVESTIGATION In sifting through thousands of UAP reports, the Condon Committee selected...
Published: May 2, 2023
28.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Project Blue Book: America’s Obsession with UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu4oTBBI5UE
Source snippet
1966 UFO Sightings in Dexter, Michigan - A Mini-Documentary...
29.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/192717159/Final-Report-of-the-Scientific-Study-of-Unidentified-Flying-Objects
30.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-1960s-condon-report-1968-condon-report-full-text-ncas-archive
31.
Source: calphysics.org
Link:https://calphysics.org/ufoskeptic.org/sturrock/toc.html
32.
Source: ufomagazines.com
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/0-scientific-journal-articles-1979-05-00-sociological-review-vol-27-no-1-suppl-joseph-a-blake/
33.
Source: luforu.org
Link:https://luforu.org/the-condon-report/
34.
Source: nicap.org
Title: Truth About Condon Report NICAP
Link:https://www.nicap.org/waves/1969TruthAbCondRep_NICAP.htm
Source snippet
Truth About Condon Report NICAP...